Indigenous · History Classes · Grades 4–6
Farming: The Three Sisters and the First Farmers
History Class · Level band: Grades 4–6
English edition — the language editions of the history classes are outstanding and will follow the site’s translation pattern; none is fabricated here.
Farming: The Domestication Centres and the Great Systems
Status: Researched draft — cultural review pending
How to read this entry: Documented fact = published archaeology, archaeobotany, genetics, or ethnohistory cited in Sources. Tradition — the people's own account = Indigenous oral history or a people's own published teaching, labelled as such. Debated / Claim = a point where published scholars disagree, or a figure given only as a sourced range. Scope note: a history of farming in the Americas, system by system, each named for its own people and place.
Farming Began More Than Once
- No single origin. Documented fact: Farming in the Americas did not spread from one centre. Syntheses recognise several independent centres where local peoples domesticated local plants: Mesoamerica, the Andes–Amazonia region, and eastern North America, among others (Smith, 2006, PNAS; Piperno, 2011, Current Anthropology). Each domesticated different species, in different environments, on its own chronology.
- A long transition. Documented fact: Dependence on domesticates took thousands of years — some 6,000 years in Mesoamerica on Smith's Guilá Naquitz argument (Smith, 1997). Later systems combined crops from more than one centre; that movement is history, not a single origin.
2. The Three Sisters and the Spread North
- The system. Documented fact: Three Sisters planting intercrops maize, beans and squash in hills: maize supports climbing beans, beans fix nitrogen through root bacteria, and squash covers the ground, shading soil and retaining moisture (Lewandowski, 1987, Agriculture and Human Values; U.S. National Agricultural Library [NAL], n.d.). Versions were practised by Haudenosaunee, Cherokee, Mandan, Hidatsa, Hopi and Zuni, among others, with local names (NAL, n.d.).
- Assembly in time. Documented fact: Squash was present for millennia; maize arrived over centuries; beans latest, the full trio widespread in the Northeast roughly 1000–1300 CE (Hart & Lovis, 2013; Fritz, 2019).
- Haudenosaunee fields — women's agriculture. Documented fact: Among the Haudenosaunee (Mohawk, Oneida, Onondaga, Cayuga, Seneca, Tuscarora), the Three Sisters — Diohe'ko, "these sustain us" in Seneca usage recorded by Arthur C. Parker (1910) — were the foundation of subsistence, planted in hills and cultivated and harvested by work parties of women (Lewandowski, 1987; Parker, 1910, in NAL, n.d.). Women farmed assisted by children, most maize dried for winter (New York State Museum, n.d.).
- Tradition — Haudenosaunee account. Corn, beans and squash sprouted from the body of Sky Woman's daughter — corn from her breasts, beans from her hands, squash from her navel (Carnegie Museum of Natural History, 2018; LaFrance, in Words That Come Before All Else).
- Mandan, Hidatsa and Arikara gardens. Documented fact: On the upper Missouri in present-day North Dakota, Mandan, Hidatsa and later Arikara women farmed fertile river bottomlands in family gardens typically about 3 to 5 acres, growing maize, beans, squash and sunflowers (Wilson, 1917; State Historical Society of North Dakota [SHSND], North Dakota Studies, n.d.). Varieties were kept in separated patches, preserving early-maturing northern varieties (SHSND, n.d.).
- Buffalo Bird Woman's record. Tradition — the people's own account, as recorded: Buffalo Bird Woman's Garden (1917, as Agriculture of the Hidatsa Indians), compiled by Gilbert L. Wilson from Waheenee — Maxidiwiac, Buffalo Bird Woman (born about 1839, Hidatsa) — who learned from her mothers (her mother and her mother's sisters) from about age 12 (Wilson, 1917; SHSND, n.d.). She describes bird-watching from a platform, digging-stick preparation, bison-scapula hoe and antler rake, and maize in hills about four feet apart. Wilson is recorder; the knowledge is Hidatsa.
Sources
Acosta (1590); Armillas (1971) Science 174; Benz (2001) PNAS 98; Brush (2004) Farmers' Bounty; Carnegie Museum of Natural History (2018); Chase & Chase (1998), in Foster (2015); Denevan (2001); Doebley (2004) Annual Review of Genetics 38; Erickson (1985, 1987, 1988); Ford & Nigh (2015) The Maya Forest Garden; Fritz (2019); Haury (1976) The Hohokam; Johnston (2003) Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 22; Kolata (1996) Valley of the Spirits; Lewandowski (1987) Agriculture and Human Values 4; Matsuoka et al. (2002) PNAS 99; Mueller (2017, 2018); Murra (1972, 1975); National Park Service (2017); New York State Museum (n.d.); Olsen & Schaal (1999) PNAS 96; Parker (1910), in U.S. National Agricultural Library (n.d.); Parsons (1976); Piperno (2011) Current Anthropology 52; Piperno & Flannery (2001) PNAS 98; Piperno & Pearsall (1998); Piperno et al. (2009) PNAS 106; Sanders, Parsons & Santley (1979) The Basin of Mexico; Scientific Reports (2023) 13:14143 (Áspero); Smith (1997) Science 276; Smith (2006) PNAS 103; Spooner et al. (2005) PNAS 102; State Historical Society of North Dakota (n.d.); Turner & Harrison, eds. (1983) Pulltrouser Swamp; Van Buren (1996) American Anthropologist 98; Wilson (1917) Agriculture of the Hidatsa Indians; International Potato Center (n.d.); Wang et al. (2015) Genetics 200.
Flagged claims and weakest-sourced points: (1) Maize chronology — genetic (~9,000 BP), Xihuatoxtla (~8,700 cal BP, indirect) and cobs (~6,250 cal BP) measure different things. (2) Hohokam totals (200–250 to ~500 miles; 25,000–70,000 acres) vary by scope counted. (3) Chinampa area and yields are model outputs, Armillas's figures argued downward. (4) Maya wetland-field regional scale — Pulltrouser secure, wider claims not ground-truthed. (5) Suka kollus extent and tonnages vary by report. (6) Chuño antiquity beyond c. 600–1000 CE evidence, and precise potato variety counts. (7) EAC synthesis dates still revised by AMS work.